Institutional Design, Local Elite Resistance, and Inequality in Access to Land: Evidence from Cotton-Growing Areas of Tajikistan

In: Central Asian Affairs
View More View Less
  • 1 Ph.D., Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Tajikistan, like other postcommunist states, embarked on agricultural land reform. The government, assisted by international organizations, implemented laws and created campaigns to break up Soviet-style collective farms and encourage independent farms. After over a decade, 66 percent of farmers in the country, including in cotton-growing areas, continue to work collectively, and 71 percent of arable land is held in collectives. I argue that the decentralized nature of the land redistribution program enabled the managers of former collective farms, re-labeled as “collective peasant farms,” to gain power so that they could use informal practices to resist peasant shareholders’ efforts to actualize their land rights. Theoretically, my argument reconciles competing perspectives about the reasons for limited land redistribution in the context of postsocialist transition. The study’s policy implication is that the government of Tajikistan, and foreign donors, instead of decentralizing the implementation of land reform, should take an active role in physically redistributing land among shareholders.

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. “Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions.” American Economic Review. 98, No. 1 (2008): 267293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allina-Pisano, Jessica. “Sub Rosa Resistance and the Politics of Economic Reform: Land Redistribution in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” World Politics. 56, No. 4 (2004): 554581.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allina-Pisano, Jessica. The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village: Politics and Property Rights in the Black Earth. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bardhan, Pranab. Scarcity, Conflicts, and Cooperation: Essays in the Political and Institutional Economics of Development. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, Andrew. Owning Russia: The Struggle over Factories, Farms, and Power. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2006.

  • Boboyorov, Hafiz. “Personal Networks of Agricultural Knowledge in the Cotton Growing Communities of Southern Tajikistan.” Demokratizatsiya. 20, No. 4 (2012): 409435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bruce, John W., and Anna Knox. “Structures and Stratagems: Making Decentralization of Authority over Land in Africa Cost-Effective.” World Development. 37, No. 8 (2009): 13601369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cemovich, Robert. “Privatization and Registration of Agricultural Land in Georgia.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 17, No. 1 (2001): 81100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chorshanbiev, Pairav. “Minselkhoz nazval prichini ezhegodnogo sokrasheniia posevnikh ploshchadei khlopchatnika.” Asia Plus, January 15, 2015. http://www.news.tj/ru/print/201670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, Kathleen. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

  • Cooke, Bill, and Kothari, Uma. “The Case for Participation as Tyranny.” In Participation: The New Tyranny?, edited by B. Cooke and U. Kothari. London: Zed Books, 2001, 115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farmer and Farm Worker Perceptions of Land Reform and Sustainable Agriculture in Tajikistan. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2012. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/701931468176056760/pdf/AAA810REPLACEM00final0report0Jun028.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fritzen, Scott A.Can the Design of Community-Driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture?World Development. 35, No. 8 (2007): 13591375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hellmann, Joel S.Winners Take All. The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics. 50, No. 2 (1998): 203234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hierman, Brent, and Navruz Nekbakhtshoev. “Land Reform by Default: Uncovering Patterns of Agricultural Decollectivization in Tajikistan.” The Journal of Peasant Studies. 45, No. 2 (2017): 409430.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hierman, Brent. “Dushanbe is Quite Far: Deconcentrated Agrarian Reform in Rural Tajikistan.” In Tajikistan on the Move: Statebuilding and Societal Transformations, edited by Marlene Laruelle. Lanham: Lexington, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hofman, Irna, and Oane Visser. “Geographies of Transition. The Political and Ecological Factors of Agrarian Change in Tajikistan.” IAMO Discussion Paper 151. Halle (Saale), Germany: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hofman, Irna. “Soft Budgets and Elastic Debt: Farm Liabilities in the Agrarian Political Economy of Post-Soviet Tajikistan.” The Journal of Peasant Studies. 45, No. 7 (2018): 13601381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Food Policy Research Institute. Feed the Future Tajikistan 2015 Zone of Influence Interim Assessment Report. Washington, DC. (2016). Accessed May 1, 2020. https://www.agrilinks.org/library/feed-future-tajikistan-2015-zone-influence-interim-assessment-report.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones Luong, Pauline. “Political Obstacles to Economic Reform in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan: Strategies to Move Ahead.” Paper Prepared for the Lucerne Conference of the CIS-7 Initiative, 2003.

  • Kassam, Shinan N. “One Explanation for Why Farmers Produce Cotton Collectively in Post-Soviet Tajikistan.” PhD diss., The University of British Columbia, 2011. https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/36114/ubc_2011_fall_kassam_shinan.pdf?sequence=7.

  • Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

  • Lerman, Zvi, and David Sedik. “Agrarian Reform in Kyrgyzstan: Achievements and the Unfinished Agenda.” Policy Studies on Rural Transition. No. 1 (2009). FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerman, Zvi, and David Sedik. “The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan.” Policy Studies on Rural Transition. No. 1 (2008). FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerman, Zvi, and William R. Sutton. “Productivity and Efficiency of Small and Large Farms in Transition: Evidence from Moldova.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 24, No. 2 (2008): 97120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lerman, Zvi. “Land Reform, Farm Structure, and Agricultural Performance in CIS Countries.” China Economic Review. No. 20 (2009): 316326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Markowitz, Lawrence. State Erosion: Unlootable Resources and Unruly Elites in Central Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.

  • Mattingly, Daniel C.Elite Capture: How Decentralization and Informal Institutions Weaken Property Rights in China.” World Politics. 68, No. 3 (2016): 383412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGlinchey, Eric. Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011.

  • Meurs, Mieke. The Evolution of Agrarian Institutions: A Comparative Study of Post-Socialist Hungary and Bulgaria. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nekbakhtshoev, Navruz. “Institutions and Property Rights Reform: Explaining Variation in Outcomes of Land Tenure Reform in Cotton-Producing Areas of Tajikistan.” PhD diss., Indiana University, 2016.

  • Peters, Pauline E.Inequality and Social Conflict Over Land in Africa.” Journal of Agrarian Change. 4, No. 3 (2004): 269314.

  • Petrick, Martin, and Michael R. Carter. “Critical Masses in the Decollectivisation of Post-Soviet Agriculture.” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 36, No. 2 (2009): 231252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrick, Martin, Dauren Oshakbayev, Regina Taitukova, and Nodir Djanibekov. “The Return of the Regulator: Kazakhstan’s Cotton Sector Reform Since Independence.” Central Asia Survey. 36, No. 4 (2017): 430452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Platteau, Jean-Phillipe. “The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub- Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment.” Development and Change. 27, No. 1 (1996): 2986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Platteau, Jean-Phillipe. “Monitoring Elite Capture in Community-Driven Development.” Development and Change. 35, No. 2 (2004): 223246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, Sarah, Ian Higginbotham, Tanya Guenther, and Andree Germain. “Land Reform in Tajikistan: Consequences for Tenure Security, Productivity, and Land Management Practices: Consequences of Land Reform in Tajikistan.” In Socioeconomic Causes and Consequences of Desertification in Central Asia, edited by Roy Behnke. Springer: Netherlands, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rowe, William. “Agrarian Adaptations in Tajikistan: Land Reform, Water, and Law.” Central Asian Survey. 29, No. 2 (2010): 189204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sattar, Sarosh, and Shaib Mohib. “Tajikistan: Cotton Farmland Privatization.” In Poverty and Social Impact Analysis of Reforms: Lessons and Examples from Implementation, edited by Aline Coudouel, Anis A. Dani, and Stefano Paternostro. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2006, 453488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaffner, Julie A.Attached Farm Labor, Limited Horizons and Servility.” Journal of Development Economics. 47 (1995): 241270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, James C. Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.

  • Sikor, Thomas, and Daniel Müller. “The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction.” World Development. 37, No. 8 (2009): 13071316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sitko, Nicholas J., Jordan Chamberlin, and Munguzwe Hichaambva. “Does Smallholder Land Titling Facilitate Agricultural Growth? An Analysis of the Determinants and Effects of Smallholder Land Titling in Zambia.” World Development. 64 (December 2014): 791802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swinnen, Johan F.M., Kristine Van Herck, and Liesbet Vranken. “Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production and Productivity in the Former Soviet Union and Productivity in the Former Soviet Union and Central and Eastern Europe.” In Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide, edited by The Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center. Ames: Iowa State University, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swinnen, Johan M., and Ayo Heinegg. “On the Political Economy of Land Reforms in the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of International Development. 14 (2002): 10191031.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Atta, Don. “‘White Gold’ or Fool’s Gold? The Political Economy of Cotton in Tajikistan.” Problems of Post-Communism. 56, No. 2 (2009): 1735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Atta, Don. “The Failure of Land Reform in Tajikistan.” Paper Presented at the Association for the Study of Nationalities. New York: Columbia University, 2008.

  • Verdery, Katherine. The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist Transilvania. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walder, Andrew G.Elite Opportunity in Transitional Economies.” American Sociological Review. 68, No. 6 (2003): 899916.

  • Wegren, Stephen K.Land Reform in Russia: What Went Wrong?Post-Soviet Affairs. 24, No. 2 (2008): 121147.

  • Wegren, Stephen K. Land Reform in Russia: Institutional Design and Behavioral Responses. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 134 134 17
Full Text Views 5 5 2
PDF Views & Downloads 10 10 4