Save

Ideological or Pragmatic? A Data-Driven Analysis of the Russian Presidential Grant Fund

In: Russian Politics
Authors:
Marlene Laruelle Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University Washington D.C., WV USA

Search for other papers by Marlene Laruelle in
Current site
Brill
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Laura Howells Government and Legal Studies Department, Bowdoin College Brunswick, ME USA

Search for other papers by Laura Howells in
Current site
Brill
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Research on Russian civil society focuses largely on the repressive legislative side of state policies, to the virtual exclusion of the rise of domestic funding, be it individual, corporate, or public. This article instead contributes to the discussion of state funding for the third sector by looking at the Russian Presidential Grant Fund, a state institution that has disbursed RUB18 billion (approx. $275 million at the August 11, 2019, exchange rate) to the third sector since 2016, making it one of the most influential sources of financial support to Russian civil society. A data-driven analysis of the Fund reveals that, although it prioritizes certain types of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) over others, there is a discernible attempt to address some of the most pressing social ills in Russia today. Whereas some grant directions, such as the “preservation of historical memory” and “development of public diplomacy and support of compatriots,” further long-held, Kremlin-sponsored ideological projects, the biggest categories supported by the Fund focus on more classical philanthropic issues, confirming the state’s growing delegation of the provision of public services to the third sector.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1066 209 33
Full Text Views 73 6 1
PDF Views & Downloads 71 11 3