Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Electoral Reform during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Russia
In: Russian PoliticsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant transformations of electoral institutions, and provoked changes in the politics of electoral reforms in some polities. The paper claims that Russia has used a special model of electoral reform during the pandemic that differs from both its previous experience and recommendations of international organizations. The comparative historical method is applied to bridge internal and external explanations that may offer an understanding of the current reform of electoral rule in the Russian political context. The pandemic has become a reason for changing traditional electoral procedures and for implementing this reform. Empirical evidence suggests that the reform has been implemented by a depoliticized technocratic procedure ignoring the principles of political consensus. The reform process implies a shift of the government’s main efforts from decision-making to increasing dependence on propaganda, and informational confrontation with opponents in the subsequent reform cycle. The approach to the implementation of the electoral reform casts doubt on the level of public support for the new procedures and exacerbates political risks.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Amat, Francesc, Andreu Arenas, Albert Fal-Gimeno and Jordi Muoz. Pandemics Meet Democracy: Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain. Working Paper, 2020. URLhttps://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/dkusw/ (accessed 15.01.2021).
-
Bainova, Maria, Bocharov, Yurii, Buzin, Andrei, Vorobyov, Nikolai, Grishin, Nikolai, Elaev, Aleksei, Korgunyuk, Yurii, Nadezhdin, Boris, and Pokrovskaya, Olga. “Elections and the Pandemic”. Electoral Politics 5, No. 1:7. URL: http://electoralpolitics.org/en/articles/vybory-v-usloviiakh-epidemii/ (accessed 15.01.2021).
-
Birch, Sara. “Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis.” Electoral Studies. 27, No 2 (2008): 305-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005.
-
Blais, André, Damien Bol, Marco Giani and Peter John Loewen. “The effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?” European Journal of Political Research. 60, No 2 (2021): 497-505. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12401.
-
Ferejohn, John. “External and internal explanation”. In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. by I. Shapiro, R. Smith, & T. Masoud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004): 144-164. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511492174.007.
-
Grishin, Nikolai. “The Meaning of Elections in the Russian Federation.” European Politics and Society. 16, No 2 (2015): 194-207. DOI: 10.1080/15705854.2014.962319.
-
Grishin, Nikolai and Anna Maria R. Leenders. “Detsentralizatsiya sistemy upravleniya vyborami.” Politeia – the Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics, No 3 (2020): 99-115. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-99-115.
-
Heller, Abigail L. “Public support for electoral reform: The role of electoral system experience.” Electoral Studies. 72 (2021), 102348. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102348.
-
Hutcheson, Derek S. and Ian McAllister. “Consolidating the Putin Regime: The 2020 Referendum on Russia’s Constitutional Amendments.” Russian Politics. 6, No 3 (2021): 355-376. DOI: 10.30965/24518921-00603004.
-
Imbrogno, Salvatore. “A case oriented research strategy as a comparative method.” Journal of International and Comparative Social Welfare 10, No. 2 (1994): 137-148. DOI: 10.1080/17486839408414909.
-
International IDEA. Elections and COVID-19: Technical Paper 1/2020. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2020. DOI: 10.31752/idea.2020.11.
-
James, Toby S. “New development: running elections during a pandemic.” Public Money & Management. 44, No 1 (2021): 65-68. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2020.1783084.
-
Jacobs, Kristof and Monique Leyenaar. “A conceptual framework for major, minor, and technical electoral reform.” West European Politics. 34, No 3 (2011): 495-513. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555977.
-
Krivonosova, Iuliia. Electoral events in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic: remote electronic voting, outdoor voting and other innovations. Stockholm: International IDEA, 2020.
-
Landman, Todd and Luca Di Gennaro Splendore. “Pandemic democracy: elections and COVID-19.” Journal of Risk Research. 23, No 7-8 (2020): 1060-1066. DOI: 10.1080 /13669877.2020.1765003.
-
Leyenaar, Monique and Reuven Y. Hazan. “Reconceptualising Electoral Reform.” West European Politics. 34, No 3 (2011): 437-455. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555974.
-
Macdonald, Robert and Thomas Molony. Holding Elections during Future Pandemics and Other Emergencies: Evidence-Based Recommendations. London: Westminster Foundation for Democracy, 2021.
-
Norris, Pippa. “Cultural explanations of electoral reform: A policy cycle model.” West European Politics. 34, No 3 (2011): 531-550. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555982.
-
Osinsky, Pavel and Jari Eloranta. “Longitudinal Comparative Historical Analysis: Challenges and Possibilities.” In Comparing Post-War Japanese and Finnish Economies and Societies – Longitudinal Perspectives, ed. by Yasushi Tanaka, Toshiaki Tamaki, Jari Ojala, and Jari Eloranta (London: Routledge, 2014): 10-17.
-
Ragin, Charles. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
-
Rahat, Gideon. “The Politics of Electoral Reform: The State of Research.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. 21, No 4 (2011): 523-543. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2011.609618.
-
Ross, Cameron. “Regional elections in Russia: instruments of authoritarian legitimacy or instability?” Palgrave Communication. 4 (2018). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0137-1.
-
Savolainen, Jukka. “The Rationality of Drawing Big Conclusions Based on SmallCases: In Defense of Mill’s Methods.” Social Forces 72 No. 4 (1994): 1217-1230.
-
The Commonwealth Secretariat. Managing Elections in the Context of COVID-19: Perspectives from the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth Secretariat, 2020.
-
Turchenko, Mikhail and Sergey Shevchuk. “Veto Players and Major Electoral Reforms in Russia.” Russian Politics. 1, No 2 (2016): 203-221. DOI: 10.1163/24518921-00102005.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 80 | 80 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Electoral Reform during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Russia
In: Russian PoliticsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant transformations of electoral institutions, and provoked changes in the politics of electoral reforms in some polities. The paper claims that Russia has used a special model of electoral reform during the pandemic that differs from both its previous experience and recommendations of international organizations. The comparative historical method is applied to bridge internal and external explanations that may offer an understanding of the current reform of electoral rule in the Russian political context. The pandemic has become a reason for changing traditional electoral procedures and for implementing this reform. Empirical evidence suggests that the reform has been implemented by a depoliticized technocratic procedure ignoring the principles of political consensus. The reform process implies a shift of the government’s main efforts from decision-making to increasing dependence on propaganda, and informational confrontation with opponents in the subsequent reform cycle. The approach to the implementation of the electoral reform casts doubt on the level of public support for the new procedures and exacerbates political risks.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 80 | 80 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6 | 6 | 0 |